VistaShares

This address is how we stay in touch with the professionals who follow our work.

VistaShares delivers innovative Liquid Alternative investment solutions for today's investors. VistaShares ETFs are actively managed by industry and investment experts, offering a number of distinct strategies. Supercycle® Growth Equity ETFs seek exposure to technology-driven economic Supercycles® that the adviser believes may offer long-term growth potential. Target 15® option-income ETFs seek to generate monthly income while complementing a core equity portfolio. Income is not guaranteed and will vary, and the Target 15® name refers to the strategy's objective rather than a guaranteed or promised return. Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. There is no guarantee that any investment objective will be achieved, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

About this address

vsharespro.com belongs to VistaShares and we use it for the email we send. Our main website is vistashares.com, and that is where our published information lives.

If a message from vsharespro.com reached you and you want to confirm it came from us, write to info@vsharespro.com or call (844) 875-2288.

The words that come up here

1. Sizing. the decision that most arguments about whether to own something are really about, conducted openly rather than left implied.
2. Sleeve. a part of a portfolio held for one purpose, which only earns its place if what it adds is not already there.
3. Look-through. reading the companies rather than the labels, because two funds in different categories can hold most of the same names.
4. Band. the drift a plan tolerates before it acts, chosen in advance so the decision survives the quarter in which acting feels least sensible.
5. Contribution. which holdings produced a result, as distinct from which holdings were largest.

The work behind these notes

Notes from here cover concentration, and the specific question of what happens when a small number of holdings carry most of the weight. That is a property of many strategies built on a single idea, it is not automatically a fault, and it is very often not understood by the person holding it until one name has a bad quarter.

The measure worth reading is how much of the return, up and down, came from the top few positions rather than how many positions there are. A hundred-holding fund where five names drive the outcome is a five-holding fund with a long tail attached, and its behaviour in a bad month will say so.

Position count is the most reassuring and least informative number on a factsheet.

It is easy to compute, it is always available, and it answers a question nobody was actually asking, which is roughly the definition of a metric that survives because it is convenient.

The number worth putting beside it is the share of the move, up and down, that came from the largest few names, because that is the one a bad month will be about.